lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+5PVA7Ro_ejBUqsZ9StWVeu59==fGnj6e4Gx8zM4_3+Lq5s4A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 22 Oct 2014 13:12:25 -0400
From:	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>
To:	Kevin Fenzi <kevin@...ye.com>
Cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: localed stuck in recent 3.18 git in copy_net_ns?

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@...ye.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 14:53:59 -0600
> Kevin Fenzi <kevin@...ye.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 16:43:26 -0400
>> Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I've seen similar soft lockup traces from the sys_unshare path when
>> > running my fuzz tester.  It seems that if you create enough network
>> > namespaces, it can take a huge amount of time for them to be
>> > iterated. (Running trinity with '-c unshare' you can see the slow
>> > down happen. In some cases, it takes so long that the watchdog
>> > process kills it -- though the SIGKILL won't get delivered until
>> > the unshare() completes)
>> >
>> > Any idea what this machine had been doing prior to this that may
>> > have involved creating lots of namespaces ?
>>
>> That was right after boot. ;)
>>
>> This is my main rawhide running laptop.
>>
>> A 'ip netns list' shows nothing.
>
> Some more information:
>
> The problem started between:
>
> v3.17-7872-g5ff0b9e1a1da and v3.17-8307-gf1d0d14120a8
>
> (I can try and do a bisect, but have to head out on a trip tomorrow)
>
> In all the kernels with the problem, there is a kworker process in D.
>
> sysrq-t says:
>                                             Showing all locks held in the system:
> Oct 21 15:06:31 voldemort.scrye.com kernel: 4 locks held by kworker/u16:0/6:
> Oct 21 15:06:31 voldemort.scrye.com kernel:  #0:  ("%s""netns"){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff810ccbff>] process_one_work+0x17f/0x850
> Oct 21 15:06:31 voldemort.scrye.com kernel:  #1:  (net_cleanup_work){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff810ccbff>] process_one_work+0x17f/0x850
> Oct 21 15:06:31 voldemort.scrye.com kernel:  #2:  (net_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff817069fc>] cleanup_net+0x8c/0x1f0
> Oct 21 15:06:31 voldemort.scrye.com kernel:  #3:
> (rcu_sched_state.barrier_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff8112a395>]
> _rcu_barrier+0x35/0x200
>
> On first running any of the systemd units that use PrivateNetwork, then
> run ok, but they are also set to timeout after a minute. On sucessive
> runs they hang in D also.

Someone else is seeing this when they try and modprobe ppp_generic:

[  240.599195] INFO: task kworker/u16:5:100 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[  240.599338]       Not tainted 3.18.0-0.rc1.git2.1.fc22.x86_64 #1
[  240.599446] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs"
disables this message.
[  240.599583] kworker/u16:5   D ffff8802202db480 12400   100      2 0x00000000
[  240.599744] Workqueue: netns cleanup_net
[  240.599823]  ffff8802202eb9e8 0000000000000096 ffff8802202db480
00000000001d5f00
[  240.600066]  ffff8802202ebfd8 00000000001d5f00 ffff8800368c3480
ffff8802202db480
[  240.600228]  ffffffff81ee2690 7fffffffffffffff ffffffff81ee2698
ffffffff81ee2690
[  240.600386] Call Trace:
[  240.600445]  [<ffffffff8185e239>] schedule+0x29/0x70
[  240.600541]  [<ffffffff8186345c>] schedule_timeout+0x26c/0x410
[  240.600651]  [<ffffffff81865ef7>] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13
[  240.600765]  [<ffffffff818644e4>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x34/0x50
[  240.600879]  [<ffffffff8185fc6c>] wait_for_completion+0x10c/0x150
[  240.601025]  [<ffffffff810e53e0>] ? wake_up_state+0x20/0x20
[  240.601133]  [<ffffffff8112a749>] _rcu_barrier+0x159/0x200
[  240.601237]  [<ffffffff8112a845>] rcu_barrier+0x15/0x20
[  240.601335]  [<ffffffff81718ebf>] netdev_run_todo+0x6f/0x310
[  240.601442]  [<ffffffff8170da85>] ? rollback_registered_many+0x265/0x2e0
[  240.601564]  [<ffffffff81725f2e>] rtnl_unlock+0xe/0x10
[  240.601660]  [<ffffffff8170f8e6>] default_device_exit_batch+0x156/0x180
[  240.601781]  [<ffffffff810fd8a0>] ? abort_exclusive_wait+0xb0/0xb0
[  240.601895]  [<ffffffff81707993>] ops_exit_list.isra.1+0x53/0x60
[  240.602028]  [<ffffffff81708540>] cleanup_net+0x100/0x1f0
[  240.602131]  [<ffffffff810ccfa8>] process_one_work+0x218/0x850
[  240.602241]  [<ffffffff810ccf0f>] ? process_one_work+0x17f/0x850
[  240.602350]  [<ffffffff810cd6c7>] ? worker_thread+0xe7/0x4a0
[  240.602454]  [<ffffffff810cd64b>] worker_thread+0x6b/0x4a0
[  240.602555]  [<ffffffff810cd5e0>] ? process_one_work+0x850/0x850
[  240.602665]  [<ffffffff810d399b>] kthread+0x10b/0x130
[  240.602762]  [<ffffffff81028cc9>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0x10
[  240.602862]  [<ffffffff810d3890>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x250/0x250
[  240.603004]  [<ffffffff818651fc>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[  240.603106]  [<ffffffff810d3890>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x250/0x250
[  240.603224] 4 locks held by kworker/u16:5/100:
[  240.603304]  #0:  ("%s""netns"){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff810ccf0f>]
process_one_work+0x17f/0x850
[  240.603495]  #1:  (net_cleanup_work){+.+.+.}, at:
[<ffffffff810ccf0f>] process_one_work+0x17f/0x850
[  240.603691]  #2:  (net_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff817084cc>]
cleanup_net+0x8c/0x1f0
[  240.603869]  #3:  (rcu_sched_state.barrier_mutex){+.+...}, at:
[<ffffffff8112a625>] _rcu_barrier+0x35/0x200
[  240.604211] INFO: task modprobe:1387 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[  240.604329]       Not tainted 3.18.0-0.rc1.git2.1.fc22.x86_64 #1
[  240.604434] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs"
disables this message.
[  240.604570] modprobe        D ffff8800cb4f1a40 13112  1387   1386 0x00000080
[  240.604719]  ffff8800cafbbbe8 0000000000000096 ffff8800cb4f1a40
00000000001d5f00
[  240.604878]  ffff8800cafbbfd8 00000000001d5f00 ffff880223280000
ffff8800cb4f1a40
[  240.605068]  ffff8800cb4f1a40 ffffffff81f8fb48 0000000000000246
ffff8800cb4f1a40
[  240.605228] Call Trace:
[  240.605283]  [<ffffffff8185e7e1>] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x31/0x80
[  240.605400]  [<ffffffff81860033>] mutex_lock_nested+0x183/0x440
[  240.605510]  [<ffffffff8170835f>] ? register_pernet_subsys+0x1f/0x50
[  240.605626]  [<ffffffff8170835f>] ? register_pernet_subsys+0x1f/0x50
[  240.605757]  [<ffffffffa0701000>] ? 0xffffffffa0701000
[  240.605854]  [<ffffffff8170835f>] register_pernet_subsys+0x1f/0x50
[  240.606005]  [<ffffffffa0701048>] br_init+0x48/0xd3 [bridge]
[  240.606112]  [<ffffffff81002148>] do_one_initcall+0xd8/0x210
[  240.606224]  [<ffffffff81153c02>] load_module+0x20c2/0x2870
[  240.606327]  [<ffffffff8114ebe0>] ? store_uevent+0x70/0x70
[  240.606433]  [<ffffffff8110ac26>] ? lock_release_non_nested+0x3c6/0x3d0
[  240.606557]  [<ffffffff81154497>] SyS_init_module+0xe7/0x140
[  240.606664]  [<ffffffff818652a9>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x17
[  240.606773] 1 lock held by modprobe/1387:
[  240.606845]  #0:  (net_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8170835f>]
register_pernet_subsys+0x1f/0x50
[  240.607114] INFO: task modprobe:1466 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[  240.607231]       Not tainted 3.18.0-0.rc1.git2.1.fc22.x86_64 #1
[  240.607337] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs"
disables this message.
[  240.607473] modprobe        D ffff88020fbab480 13096  1466   1399 0x00000084
[  240.607622]  ffff88020d1bbbe8 0000000000000096 ffff88020fbab480
00000000001d5f00
[  240.607791]  ffff88020d1bbfd8 00000000001d5f00 ffffffff81e1b580
ffff88020fbab480
[  240.607949]  ffff88020fbab480 ffffffff81f8fb48 0000000000000246
ffff88020fbab480
[  240.608138] Call Trace:
[  240.608193]  [<ffffffff8185e7e1>] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x31/0x80
[  240.608316]  [<ffffffff81860033>] mutex_lock_nested+0x183/0x440
[  240.608425]  [<ffffffff817083ad>] ? register_pernet_device+0x1d/0x70
[  240.608542]  [<ffffffff817083ad>] ? register_pernet_device+0x1d/0x70
[  240.608662]  [<ffffffffa071d000>] ? 0xffffffffa071d000
[  240.608759]  [<ffffffff817083ad>] register_pernet_device+0x1d/0x70
[  240.608881]  [<ffffffffa071d020>] ppp_init+0x20/0x1000 [ppp_generic]
[  240.609021]  [<ffffffff81002148>] do_one_initcall+0xd8/0x210
[  240.609131]  [<ffffffff81153c02>] load_module+0x20c2/0x2870
[  240.609235]  [<ffffffff8114ebe0>] ? store_uevent+0x70/0x70
[  240.609339]  [<ffffffff8110ac26>] ? lock_release_non_nested+0x3c6/0x3d0
[  240.609462]  [<ffffffff81154497>] SyS_init_module+0xe7/0x140
[  240.609568]  [<ffffffff818652a9>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x17
[  240.609677] 1 lock held by modprobe/1466:
[  240.609749]  #0:  (net_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff817083ad>]
register_pernet_device+0x1d/0x70

Looks like contention on net_mutex or something, but I honestly have
no idea yet.  I can't recreate it myself at the moment or I would
bisect.

Has nobody else run into this with the pre-3.18 kernels?  Fedora isn't
carrying any patches in this area.

josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ