linux-kernel - Re: Regression: audit: x86: drop arch from __audit_syscall

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1414014268.30946.103.camel@localhost>
Date:	Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:44:28 -0400
From:	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@...il.com>,
	Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-audit@...hat.com,
	Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: Regression: audit: x86: drop arch from __audit_syscall_entry()
 interface

On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 14:43 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 10/22/2014 02:38 PM, Eric Paris wrote:
> > 
> > It was sent, numerous times, to the x86 list for reviews, and lived in
> > -next for 2 complete devel cycles without a complaint.  I'm trying to
> > get an i386 system to test a fix.  But yes, it's total crap.
> > 
> 
> You don't need an i386 system -- you can install an i386 distro on an
> x86-64 system, or in KVM.

I'm currently building on i386 on KVM.  That's what I meant by "get"

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/