[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1414017873.30946.105.camel@localhost>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 18:44:33 -0400
From: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@...il.com>,
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-audit@...hat.com,
Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: Regression: audit: x86: drop arch from __audit_syscall_entry()
interface
On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 14:43 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 10/22/2014 02:38 PM, Eric Paris wrote:
> >
> > It was sent, numerous times, to the x86 list for reviews, and lived in
> > -next for 2 complete devel cycles without a complaint. I'm trying to
> > get an i386 system to test a fix. But yes, it's total crap.
> >
>
> You don't need an i386 system -- you can install an i386 distro on an
> x86-64 system, or in KVM.
So I might still be an idiot, because I still haven't gotten a working
kernel. But I can't get Linus' latest not panic even without
CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL. I kept blaming myself for not fixing this problem,
but reverting the patch like the reporter didn't give me bootable
kernels either.
I just jumped back in time and am looking to get anything I build to
boot...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists