linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] block: wrong return value

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 23 Oct 2014 08:12:06 -0600
From:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: wrong return value

On 10/23/2014 07:20 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> while compiling integer err was showing as a set but unused variable.
> elevator_init_fn can be either cfq_init_queue or deadline_init_queue
> or noop_init_queue.
> all three of these functions are returning -ENOMEM if they fail to
> allocate the queue. 
> so we should actually be returning the error code rather than
> returning 0 always.

That does look weird. You need an elevator_put() in the error case,
though, ala:

err = e->ops.elevator_init_fn(q, e);
if (err)
	elevator_put(e);

return err;


-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/