linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] block: wrong return value

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141023150805.GA4924@sudip-PC>
Date:	Thu, 23 Oct 2014 20:38:05 +0530
From:	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: wrong return value

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 08:12:06AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 10/23/2014 07:20 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > while compiling integer err was showing as a set but unused variable.
> > elevator_init_fn can be either cfq_init_queue or deadline_init_queue
> > or noop_init_queue.
> > all three of these functions are returning -ENOMEM if they fail to
> > allocate the queue. 
> > so we should actually be returning the error code rather than
> > returning 0 always.
> 
> That does look weird. You need an elevator_put() in the error case,
> though, ala:
> 
oops.. sorry i missed that elevator_get in the code.
I will send you v2 of the patch.

thanks
sudip

> err = e->ops.elevator_init_fn(q, e);
> if (err)
> 	elevator_put(e);
> 
> return err;
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jens Axboe
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/