[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8761f93o0g.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:50:07 +0300
From: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, kan.liang@...el.com,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, acme@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 12/20] x86: perf: intel_pt: Intel PT PMU driver
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 04:45:40PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
>> + if (test_cpu_cap(&boot_cpu_data, X86_FEATURE_INTEL_PT)) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < PT_CPUID_LEAVES; i++)
>> + cpuid_count(20, i,
>> + &pt_pmu.caps[CR_EAX + i * 4],
>> + &pt_pmu.caps[CR_EBX + i * 4],
>> + &pt_pmu.caps[CR_ECX + i * 4],
>> + &pt_pmu.caps[CR_EDX + i * 4]);
>> + } else
>> + return -ENODEV;
>
> Please use {} for every multi-line stmt, even if its a single stmt, also
> use {} in both branches of a condition, even if only one strictly
> requires it.
Ok.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists