[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8738ad3nx6.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:52:05 +0300
From: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, kan.liang@...el.com,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, acme@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 12/20] x86: perf: intel_pt: Intel PT PMU driver
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 04:45:40PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
>> +static bool pt_event_valid(struct perf_event *event)
>> +{
>> + u64 config = event->attr.config;
>> +
>> + /* admin can set any packet generation parameters */
>> + if (capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) && (config & PT_BYPASS_MASK) == config)
>> + return true;
>> +
>> + if ((config & PT_CONFIG_MASK) != config)
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + return true;
>> +}
>
> This seems to suggest PT is available to !priv users, is this right?
Yes, that's the intention. PT does CPL-based filtering in hardware and
unlike previous attempts at branch tracing, does not leak out-of-context
addresses (or any other information for that matter).
Regards,
--
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists