linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5] ARM: dts: Add dts files for Exynos4415 SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 24 Oct 2014 15:30:01 +0200
From:	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
To:	Daniel Drake <drake@...lessm.com>,
	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
CC:	linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>, ben-linux@...ff.org,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	thomas.abraham@...aro.org,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@...sung.com>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	InKi Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>, geunsik.lim@...sung.com,
	jh80.chung@...sung.com, jaewon02.kim@...sung.com,
	ideal.song@...sung.com, yj44.cho@...sung.com,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] ARM: dts: Add dts files for Exynos4415 SoC

On 24.10.2014 15:23, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com> wrote:
>> This patch adds new exynos4415.dtsi to support Exynos4415 SoC
>> based on Cortex-A9 quad cores and includes following dt nodes:
> 
> There's a lot in common between your new exynos4415.dtsi and the
> existing exynos4.dtsi.
> Would it make more sense for the 4415 code to extend the existing
> exynos4.dtsi like the other Exynos4 variants do?

This would make sense, but then existing Exynos 4 device tree sources
would have to be refactored to use reference-based syntax for extending
nodes. (Which is desirable anyway, but adds quite a bit of effort and
could be prone to conflicts.) I'd say that they could be merged later
anyway.

Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/