[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141024200833.GI11455@saruman>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 15:08:33 -0500
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
CC: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
BenoƮt Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@...com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, <nsekhar@...com>,
<t-kristo@...com>, <j-keerthy@...com>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/20] rtc: omap: fixes and power-off feature
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 09:55:32PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 02:44:42PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 09:36:55PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 02:29:48PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 02:25:40PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> > > > > with this I always get to "Power off failed -- system halted". If I
> > > > > switch to v3.18-rc1 vanilla, then it works. So it's definitely caused by
> > > > > your rtc-only patches.
> > >
> > > That's expected (see below). It works with v3.18-rc1 vanilla because
> > > machine_halt is called instead of machine_power_off as there is no
> > > registered power-off handler.
> >
> > yeah, that much I figured :-)
> >
> > > > ok, so it seems like it takes more than 1 second for things to
> > > > propagate. If I increase that mdelay() to 3000, then everything works
> > > > fine on my end. I think we should get RMK's input on this 3000ms delay
> > > > to machine_power_off(). Should it be generic, or should we add it to our
> > > > rtc pm_power_off implementation ?
> > >
> > > As I wrote above, we still need a 2-second mdelay in rtc-omap, which I
> > > intend to add to the pmic_power_en patch.
> >
> > oh, alright then. If you can Cc me, I'll make sure to test that too ;-)
>
> I will. :) Just wanted to see whether Andrew preferred I resend the
> whole series or just that one patch first.
>
> The diff is minimal:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c
> index e74750f00b18..e4f97ad9eb21 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c
> @@ -423,6 +423,8 @@ static void omap_rtc_power_off(void)
> val = rtc_read(rtc, OMAP_RTC_INTERRUPTS_REG);
> rtc_writel(rtc, OMAP_RTC_INTERRUPTS_REG,
> val | OMAP_RTC_INTERRUPTS_IT_ALARM2);
> +
> + mdelay(2000);
> }
you can add my:
Tested-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
for this too. Now it's all good.
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists