[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20141027.184327.1734954193920971940.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 18:43:27 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, steve.capper@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [GIT] Sparc
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:09:38 -0700
> Perhaps sparc should be defining CONFIG_HAVE_GENERIC_RCU_GUP.
>
> We really should switch x86 to the generic version - from a quick read
> it looks like it will work without needing any changes.
>
> Steve, thoughts?
We need to add the necessary hooks to the generic code so that x86
doesn't so specualtive gets and instead do direct increments,
otherwise it's a performance regression, and then sparc can make use
of that as well.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists