[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20141027140938.142f83a4c3bc6512dd73b54c@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:09:38 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steve Capper <steve.capper@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT] Sparc
On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:47:48 -0700 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:32 AM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> >
> > It's really idiotic to have a weak symbolled fallback that just
> > returns zero, and causes this kind of bug. There should be no
> > backup implementation and the link should fail if the architecture
> > fails to provide __get_user_pages_fast() and supports transparent
> > hugepages.
>
> Agreed. I think the weak fallback is for the "no hugepages support"
> case, but that does sound very annoying and fragile.
>
Yup. I'm thinking the get_user_pages_fast() and
__get_user_pages_fast() in mm/util.c should be made non-weak and moved
to mm/nommu.c.
With that change, MMU architctures will need to either define
CONFIG_HAVE_GENERIC_RCU_GUP or implement their own versions.
Perhaps sparc should be defining CONFIG_HAVE_GENERIC_RCU_GUP.
We really should switch x86 to the generic version - from a quick read
it looks like it will work without needing any changes.
Steve, thoughts?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists