[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141027121256.GF6879@mwanda>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 15:12:57 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Florian Schilhabel <florian.c.schilhabel@...glemail.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8712: remove unused variables
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 05:22:21PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 02:13:12PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 06:03:33PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > @@ -262,7 +257,7 @@ static u8 rtl8712_dl_fw(struct _adapter *padapter)
> > > if (tmp8_a != (tmp8|BIT(2)))
> > > goto exit_fail;
> > >
> > > - tmp32 = r8712_read32(padapter, TCR);
> > > + r8712_read32(padapter, TCR);
> >
> > I wonder if we actually need to call r8712_read32() here? It's not
> > clear. The changelog should say one way or the other. Maybe something
> > like "I left a call to r8712_read32(padapter, TCR) because I didn't know
> > if it had side effects". When you note down questions you have in the
> > changelog that helps reviewers.
> sure. i will resend it with modified commit log.
> r8712_read32() is ultimately calling usb_read32() which is again calling r8712_usbctrl_vendorreq().
> this r8712_usbctrl_vendorreq() is communicating through the usb bus and is sending and receiving the control msg.
> that is why i didnot remove it.
Yeah. I'm 95% sure it's not needed, but I suppose it's better to err
on the side of caution.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists