[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141027172636.GZ18557@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 17:26:36 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
Cc: Romain Perier <romain.perier@...il.com>, heiko@...ech.de,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, grant.likely@...aro.org,
robh@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, johan@...nel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux@...ck-us.net, lee.jones@...aro.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
linux@....linux.org.uk, swarren@...dotorg.org,
thierry.reding@...il.com, gnurou@...il.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 02/10] dt-bindings: Document the standard property
"system-power-controller"
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:39:18AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 04:26:47PM +0000, Romain Perier wrote:
> > +act8846: act8846@5 {
> > + compatible = "active-semi,act8846";
> > + status = "okay";
> > + system-power-controller;
> > +}
> there is no mention here that system-power-controller superseeds
> poweroff-source and deprecates that.
Given that poweroff-source hasn't made it into a released kernel yet we
can probably just kill it off completely can't we?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists