[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <544F66A2.1080302@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:49:22 +0100
From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
To: Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>, mgorman@...e.de,
mina86@...a86.com
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
pratikp@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: Deadlock with CMA and CPU hotplug
Hello,
On 2014-10-22 18:57, Laura Abbott wrote:
> We've run into a AB/BA deadlock situation involving a driver lock and
> the CPU hotplug lock on a 3.10 based kernel. The situation is this:
>
> CPU 0 CPU 1
> ----- ----
> Start CPU hotplug
> mutex_lock(&cpu_hotplug.lock)
> Run CPU hotplug notifier
> data for driver comes in
> mutex_lock(&driver_lock)
> driver calls dma_alloc_coherent
> alloc_contig_range
> lru_add_drain_all
> get_online_cpus()
> mutex_lock(&cpu_hotplug.lock)
>
> Driver hotplug notifier runs
> mutex_lock(&driver_lock)
>
> The driver itself is out of tree right now[1] and we're looking at
> ways to rework the driver. The best option for rework right now
> though might result in some performance penalties. The size that's
> being allocated can't easily be converted to an atomic allocation either
> It seems like this might be a limitation of where CMA/
> dma_alloc_coherent could potentially be used and make drivers
> unnecessarily aware of CPU hotplug locking.
>
> Does this seem like an actual problem that needs to be fixed or
> is trying to use CMA in a CPU hotplug notifier path just asking
> for trouble?
IMHO doing any allocation without GFP_ATOMIC from a notifier is asking
for problems. I always considered notifiers as callbacks that might be
called
directly from i.e. interrupts. I don't know much about your code, but
maybe it
would be possible to move the problematic code from a notifier to a separate
worker or thread?
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists