[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <544F8F3A.3030505@citrix.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 12:42:34 +0000
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
CC: <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] xen: Switch to virtual mapped linear
p2m list
On 28/10/14 12:39, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 28/10/14 12:07, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> Okay, back to the original question: is the (up to) 64 MB virtual
>> mapping of the p2m list on 32-bit pv domains a problem or not?
> I think up-to 64 MiB of vmalloc area is fine. The vmalloc space can be
> increased with a command line option in the unlikely event that there
> are domUs that would be affected.
>
>> If yes, the virtual mapped linear p2m list could still be used on
>> 64 bit domains, paving the way for support of more than 512 GB of
>> domain memory. OTOH having to keep the p2m tree coding alive isn't
>> my favorite solution...
> Having to keep both the tree and linear p2m code would be awful. Let's
> not do this!
>
> David
How is the toolstack expected to find and mutate this p2m on migrate?
The toolstack does not use guest pagetables.
~Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists