[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdb+p5tyyZvARLA5R6oayezJNemLzYDjT-jzrtoPqW2qsA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 18:02:23 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] pinctrl: Provide a generic device tree binding for per-pin
pin controllers
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> Most iomux controllers allow a configuration per pin. These currently
> have no common device tree binding. There are many different SoC
> specific bindings for this class of iomux controllers. Some controllers
> artificially group pins together where in hardware no groups exist (for
> example lantiq). Other controllers just put each pin into a separate
> group which explodes to many many strings to parse (Tegra30).
So I'd specifically like Stephen Warrens comments on this proposal,
as well as from everyone else doing per-pin device tree configs.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists