| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 09:16:03 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Alexis Berlemont <alexis.berlemont@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dsahern@...il.com, mingo@...hat.com,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, paulus@...ba.org, acme@...nel.org,
namhyung@...nel.org, mmarek@...e.cz,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/14] perf tools: Add kbuild support into
Makefile.kbuild
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 12:20:29AM +0200, Alexis Berlemont wrote:
> From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
SNIP
> ---
> tools/perf/Kbuild | 47 +++
> tools/perf/Kconfig | 284 ++++++++++++++
> tools/perf/Makefile.kbuild | 431 +++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/perf/Makefile.perf | 2 +-
> tools/perf/arch/Kbuild | 3 +
> tools/perf/arch/arm/Kbuild | 2 +
> tools/perf/arch/arm/Makefile | 14 -
> tools/perf/arch/arm/tests/Kbuild | 2 +
> tools/perf/arch/arm/util/Kbuild | 3 +
> tools/perf/arch/arm64/Kbuild | 1 +
> tools/perf/arch/arm64/Makefile | 7 -
> tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/Kbuild | 2 +
> tools/perf/arch/powerpc/Kbuild | 1 +
> tools/perf/arch/powerpc/Makefile | 6 -
> tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/Kbuild | 3 +
> tools/perf/arch/s390/Kbuild | 1 +
> tools/perf/arch/s390/Makefile | 7 -
> tools/perf/arch/s390/util/Kbuild | 2 +
> tools/perf/arch/sh/Kbuild | 1 +
> tools/perf/arch/sh/Makefile | 4 -
> tools/perf/arch/sh/util/Kbuild | 1 +
> tools/perf/arch/sparc/Kbuild | 1 +
> tools/perf/arch/sparc/Makefile | 4 -
> tools/perf/arch/sparc/util/Kbuild | 1 +
> tools/perf/arch/x86/Kbuild | 1 +
> tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/Kbuild | 3 +
> tools/perf/{ => arch/x86}/tests/perf-time-to-tsc.c | 0
> tools/perf/arch/x86/util/Kbuild | 5 +
> tools/perf/bench/Kbuild | 12 +
> tools/perf/builtin-cmds.h | 4 +
> tools/perf/config/Makefile | 55 ++-
> tools/perf/config/Makefile.fix-config | 104 +++++
> tools/perf/config/Makefile.fix-legacy | 46 +++
> tools/perf/config/defconfig | 54 +++
> tools/perf/perf-sys.h | 4 +-
> tools/perf/scripts/perl/Perf-Trace-Util/Kbuild | 6 +
> tools/perf/scripts/python/Perf-Trace-Util/Kbuild | 5 +
> tools/perf/tests/Kbuild | 38 ++
> tools/perf/ui/Kbuild | 15 +
> tools/perf/ui/browsers/Kbuild | 9 +
> tools/perf/ui/gtk/Kbuild | 9 +
> tools/perf/ui/stdio/Kbuild | 1 +
> tools/perf/ui/tui/Kbuild | 4 +
> tools/perf/util/Kbuild | 126 ++++++
> tools/perf/util/PERF-VERSION-GEN | 4 +
> tools/perf/util/generate-cmdlist.sh | 8 +-
> tools/perf/util/scripting-engines/Kbuild | 11 +
> tools/perf/util/setup.py | 8 +-
so this patch took the perf Makefile (at that time) and changed it to
use the kbuild.. but since that time the Makefile.perf came and many
other changes, which need to be reflected in Makefile.kbuild
I need to revisit the logic and split the change into more incremental
patches (the patchset is too big)
I can redo patches 2,3,4 and get back to you, sounds ok?
thanks,
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists