[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141029230507.GA15701@marx-slim.home>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 00:05:07 +0100
From: Alexis Berlemont <alexis.berlemont@...il.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dsahern@...il.com, mingo@...hat.com,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, paulus@...ba.org, acme@...nel.org,
namhyung@...nel.org, mmarek@...e.cz,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/14] perf tools: Add kbuild support into
Makefile.kbuild
Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 12:20:29AM +0200, Alexis Berlemont wrote:
> > From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
>
> SNIP
>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/Kbuild | 47 +++
> > tools/perf/Kconfig | 284 ++++++++++++++
> > tools/perf/Makefile.kbuild | 431 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > tools/perf/Makefile.perf | 2 +-
> > tools/perf/arch/Kbuild | 3 +
> > tools/perf/arch/arm/Kbuild | 2 +
> > tools/perf/arch/arm/Makefile | 14 -
> > tools/perf/arch/arm/tests/Kbuild | 2 +
> > tools/perf/arch/arm/util/Kbuild | 3 +
> > tools/perf/arch/arm64/Kbuild | 1 +
> > tools/perf/arch/arm64/Makefile | 7 -
> > tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/Kbuild | 2 +
> > tools/perf/arch/powerpc/Kbuild | 1 +
> > tools/perf/arch/powerpc/Makefile | 6 -
> > tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/Kbuild | 3 +
> > tools/perf/arch/s390/Kbuild | 1 +
> > tools/perf/arch/s390/Makefile | 7 -
> > tools/perf/arch/s390/util/Kbuild | 2 +
> > tools/perf/arch/sh/Kbuild | 1 +
> > tools/perf/arch/sh/Makefile | 4 -
> > tools/perf/arch/sh/util/Kbuild | 1 +
> > tools/perf/arch/sparc/Kbuild | 1 +
> > tools/perf/arch/sparc/Makefile | 4 -
> > tools/perf/arch/sparc/util/Kbuild | 1 +
> > tools/perf/arch/x86/Kbuild | 1 +
> > tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/Kbuild | 3 +
> > tools/perf/{ => arch/x86}/tests/perf-time-to-tsc.c | 0
> > tools/perf/arch/x86/util/Kbuild | 5 +
> > tools/perf/bench/Kbuild | 12 +
> > tools/perf/builtin-cmds.h | 4 +
> > tools/perf/config/Makefile | 55 ++-
> > tools/perf/config/Makefile.fix-config | 104 +++++
> > tools/perf/config/Makefile.fix-legacy | 46 +++
> > tools/perf/config/defconfig | 54 +++
> > tools/perf/perf-sys.h | 4 +-
> > tools/perf/scripts/perl/Perf-Trace-Util/Kbuild | 6 +
> > tools/perf/scripts/python/Perf-Trace-Util/Kbuild | 5 +
> > tools/perf/tests/Kbuild | 38 ++
> > tools/perf/ui/Kbuild | 15 +
> > tools/perf/ui/browsers/Kbuild | 9 +
> > tools/perf/ui/gtk/Kbuild | 9 +
> > tools/perf/ui/stdio/Kbuild | 1 +
> > tools/perf/ui/tui/Kbuild | 4 +
> > tools/perf/util/Kbuild | 126 ++++++
> > tools/perf/util/PERF-VERSION-GEN | 4 +
> > tools/perf/util/generate-cmdlist.sh | 8 +-
> > tools/perf/util/scripting-engines/Kbuild | 11 +
> > tools/perf/util/setup.py | 8 +-
>
> so this patch took the perf Makefile (at that time) and changed it to
> use the kbuild.. but since that time the Makefile.perf came and many
> other changes, which need to be reflected in Makefile.kbuild
>
> I need to revisit the logic and split the change into more incremental
> patches (the patchset is too big)
>
> I can redo patches 2,3,4 and get back to you, sounds ok?
Of course.
Which changes in Makefile.perf do you have in mind ? I thought that
Makefile.kbuild was just supposed to build the few extra dependencies
(libtraceevent, etc.). I thought that I updated your original patch
accordingly with the changes before and after the add of
Makefile.perf.
Alexis.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists