[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <545782AA.5080408@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 14:27:06 +0100
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Ilya Dryomov <ilya.dryomov@...tank.com>
CC: Sage Weil <sage@...tank.com>,
Ceph Development <ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, trivial@...nel.org,
Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>,
"Yan, Zheng" <zyan@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: ceph: Deletion of unnecessary checks before two function calls
> dput() also checks for NULL argument, but the check is wrapped into
> unlikely(), which is why I presume it wasn't picked up. It would be
> great if you could improve your coccinelle script to handle
> {un,}likely() as well.
Thanks for your suggestion.
Should I consider any more fine-tuning for the affected script
"list_input_parameter_validation1.cocci" in the near future?
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/5/362
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.coccinelle/3514
>> @@ -590,15 +589,13 @@ static void queue_realm_cap_snaps(struct ceph_snap_realm
>> *realm)
>
> The patch was corrupted, that should have been a single line. I fixed
> it up but you may want to look into your email client settings.
Thanks for your feedback.
Does this example show a conflict between long comments after patch ranges and
line length limitation for email eventually?
Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists