linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH resent] ALSA: emu10k1: Deletion of unnecessary checks before three function calls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 03 Nov 2014 15:10:40 +0100
From:	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
CC:	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	trivial@...nel.org, Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resent] ALSA: emu10k1: Deletion of unnecessary checks
 before three function calls

> Your patch can't be applied cleanly due to your MUA breaking the
> lines.  Please fix your MUA setup, or use an attachment if it's
> impossible, and resend the patch.

Thanks for your feedback.

Does this example show a conflict between long comments like
"snd_emu10k1_ctl_private_free( ... *kctl)" after patch ranges and line length
limitation for email eventually?


> Also, try to align the subject line with the relevant commits.  See
> "git log sound/pci/emu10k1"

I have attached my update suggestion with a slightly different commit title as
before. Is this variant acceptable?

Regards,
Markus

View attachment "0001-ALSA-emu10k1-Deletion-of-unnecessary-checks-before-t.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (2121 bytes)