[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5457C7B7.7050302@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 19:21:43 +0100
From: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@....de>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
"Sergey \"Shnatsel\" Davidoff" <sergey@...mentaryos.org>
CC: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: A desktop environment[1] kernel wishlist
On 31.10.2014 10:36, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Mon 27-10-14 20:02:51, Sergey "Shnatsel" Davidoff wrote:
>>> If "recursive mtime" was available, would that work for you?
>>
>> It would work for detecting "offline" changes. I suppose recursive
>> mtime not viable for online monitoring, mostly because detecting file
>> renaming would be a massive PITA (and we already have fanotify with
>> exactly this problem).
> Yes, you'll get only "something has changed in a subtree" information for
> each directory. You'd then have to rescan the directory to find out what
> has changed. But there's no simple solution for this - either you have to
> process tons of events for busy directory tree or you have to somehow
> reduce the amount of information provided to userspace...
If inotify_add_watch() would allow to mark a complete mount (like
fanotify_mark() called with FAN_MOUNT) events for all files on this
mount could be detected. If furthermore inotify_read() would return the
complete relative path of the changed file relative to the mount in
inotify_event->name, it would be obvious what the meaning of the event is.
Best regards
Heinrich Schuchardt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists