[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4656BEB6164FC34F8171C6538F1A595B2E9AB082@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 00:51:55 +0000
From: "Chen, Alvin" <alvin.chen@...el.com>
To: Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.logic@...us-software.ie>,
"Tan, Raymond" <raymond.tan@...el.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Shevchenko, Andriy" <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] mfd: intel_quark_i2c_gpio: Add Intel Quark X1000
I2C-GPIO MFD Driver
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chen, Alvin
> Sent: Tuesday, November 4, 2014 8:46 AM
> To: 'Bryan O'Donoghue'; Tan, Raymond; Lee Jones; Samuel Ortiz
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Shevchenko, Andriy
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] mfd: intel_quark_i2c_gpio: Add Intel Quark X1000
> I2C-GPIO MFD Driver
>
> >
> > On 03/11/14 07:39, Raymond Tan wrote:
> > > + pdata->properties->irq = pdev->irq;
> > > + pdata->properties->irq_shared = true;
> >
> > OK I see it.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > My question is. How extensively have edge triggered interrupts been
> > tested on the GPIO block ?
> >
> > The BSP reference code is quite explicit about not missing edge interrupts.
> >
> > Have you tested GPIO input in edge mode ?
> We indeed test edge mode. Now all are moved to gpio-dwapb module which
> has been accepted by maintainer.
> The BSP code doesn't meet the requirement of upstream, so we totally
> re-implement this feature in gpio-dwapb.
> This patch only passes the necessary parameters and registers the platform
> devices.
>
>
Just double check, the support of Quark designware GPIO has been in 3.18-rc2.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists