[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141104005329.GA3815@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 00:53:29 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Gyungoh Yoo <gyungoh@...il.com>
Cc: sameo@...ux.intel.com, lee.jones@...aro.org, jg1.han@...sung.com,
cooloney@...il.com, lgirdwood@...il.com, jack.yoo@...worksinc.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
grant.likely@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
pawel.moll@....com, heiko@...ech.de, jason@...edaemon.net,
shawn.guo@...escale.com, treding@...dia.com,
florian.vaussard@...l.ch, trivial@...nel.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
andrew@...n.ch, jic23@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RESUBMIT PATCH v6 7/8] regulator: sky81452: Add compatible
string for device binding
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 09:43:34AM +0900, Gyungoh Yoo wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 04:44:18PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > This doesn't apply against current code and depends on the MFD symbol
> > rename - can you please check what's going on here?
> Are you talking about 'sky81452-regulator'?
> I am sorry I don't understand. Can you explain in more detail?
No, I mean the Kconfig change.
> > It would make sense to split the Kconfig symbol rename into a separate
> > patch to ease merging, it doesn't seem obviously related to the driver
> > change and should probably be in the same patch as the MFD symbol rename
> > for bisetion.
> becuase the symbol in the modfied MFD does not match with the
> merged regulator driver, it was hard to split the patch.
I'm having a hard time understanding why it is difficult to split the
two changes - they are in completely separate files.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists