[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141104114120.GJ3815@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 11:41:20 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Gyungoh Yoo <gyungoh@...il.com>
Cc: sameo@...ux.intel.com, lee.jones@...aro.org, jg1.han@...sung.com,
cooloney@...il.com, lgirdwood@...il.com, jack.yoo@...worksinc.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
grant.likely@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
pawel.moll@....com, heiko@...ech.de, jason@...edaemon.net,
shawn.guo@...escale.com, treding@...dia.com,
florian.vaussard@...l.ch, trivial@...nel.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
andrew@...n.ch, jic23@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RESUBMIT PATCH v6 7/8] regulator: sky81452: Add compatible
string for device binding
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 02:45:34PM +0900, Gyungoh Yoo wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 12:53:29AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > I'm having a hard time understanding why it is difficult to split the
> > two changes - they are in completely separate files.
> I am sorry for the hard time.
> That was because the symbol changes had a dependency with 1/8.
> In this case, Should Kconfig symbol change back from MFD_SKY81452
> to SKY81452 in this patch series? And then should I submit to change to MFD_SKY81452
> with seperate patch?
No, what I'm saying is that if you want to rename the Kconfig symbol you
should do that as part of a separate patch to changing the DT stuff.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists