[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141104143559.GQ17577@x1>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 14:35:59 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>, gyungoh@...il.com,
sameo@...ux.intel.com, jg1.han@...sung.com, cooloney@...il.com,
lgirdwood@...il.com, jack.yoo@...worksinc.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
grant.likely@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
pawel.moll@....com, heiko@...ech.de, jason@...edaemon.net,
shawn.guo@...escale.com, treding@...dia.com,
florian.vaussard@...l.ch, trivial@...nel.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
andrew@...n.ch, jic23@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RESUBMIT PATCH v6 1/8] mfd: Add support for Skyworks SKY81452
driver
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 09:16:09AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 04 Nov 2014, Paul Bolle wrote:
>
> > > Nothing will break. But I think Mark prefers the dependency rename, now
> > > done in 7/8, to be done as part of this patch.
>
> > I don't agree. The rename should be taken independantly by Mark.
> > The regulator driver won't build until they match anyway, so there's
> > no hard dependency. Unless someone can give me a really good reason
> > to revert it, I'm applying this driver now.
>
> The important thing is that the dependency rename isn't silently thrown
> into an unrelated patch.
That I agree with.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists