[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <35FD53F367049845BC99AC72306C23D103E010D18288@CNBJMBX05.corpusers.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 09:45:42 +0800
From: "Wang, Yalin" <Yalin.Wang@...ymobile.com>
To: 'Will Deacon' <will.deacon@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
CC: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"akinobu.mita@...il.com" <akinobu.mita@...il.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC V6 3/3] arm64:add bitrev.h file to support rbit instruction
> From: Will Deacon [mailto:will.deacon@....com]
> >
> > If this is the case, I suggest you update patch 8187/1 to retain the
> > byte_rev_table symbol, even in the accelerated case, and remove it
> > with a followup patch once Joe's patches have landed upstream. Also, a
> > link to the patches would be nice, and perhaps a bit of explanation
> > how/when they are expected to be merged.
>
> Indeed, or instead put together a series with the appropriate acks so
> somebody can merge it all in one go. Merging this on a piecemeal basis is
> going to cause breakages (as you pointed out).
>
> Will
Hi Will,
Could I add you as ack-by , and submit these 2 patches into the
Patch system ?
So you can merge them together .
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists