lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1415065194.24825.13.camel@debian>
Date:	Tue, 04 Nov 2014 09:39:54 +0800
From:	Chen Yucong <slaoub@...il.com>
To:	Aravind Gopalakrishnan <aravind.gopalakrishnan@....com>
Cc:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, tony.luck@...el.com,
	ak@...ux.intel.com, gong.chen@...ux.intel.com,
	linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86, mce, amd: extend mce-inject for support
 threshold interrupt event injection on AMD platform

On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 11:51 -0600, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
> On 11/3/2014 11:05 AM, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
> >
> > There are three ways that have been used to report machine check event.
> > And they are MCE, CMCI/Threshold Interrupt, and POLL. On the Intel
> > platform, CMCI/Threshold Interrupt and POLL share the same event handler
> > - machine_check_poll(). However, on the AMD platform, they have a
> > separate event handler. amd_threshold_interrupt() is used for handling
> > Threshold Interrupt event. And machine_check_poll() has been used for
> > polling other events.
> >
> > This patch introduces a new flag MCJ_INTERRUPT that will be used to
> > separate CMCI/Threshold Interrupt and POLL handler in mce-inject.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chen Yucong <slaoub@...il.com <mailto:slaoub@...il.com>>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h              |    5 +++--
> >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-inject.c |   16 ++++++++++++++++
> >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/threshold.c  |    1 +
> >  3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> 
> 
> We currently test decoding logic on AMD by performing mce injections 
> using edac/mce_amd_inj.c,
> So instead of modifying mce-inject just for testing 
> amd_threshold_interrupt(),
> Why not put it under mce_amd_inj? (It's AMD specific code anyway)
> 
Until now, edac/mce_amd_inj.c is just used for testing EDAC decoding
logic on AMD. But there are some tools that can be also used to decode
machine check error information, such as `rasdaemon' and `mcelog'. If
we want to use mce_amd_inj.c for error injection, we may need to move
it.

In addition, EDAC decoding logic does not need to access machine check 
specific `MSRs', so edac/mce_amd_inj.c can work well for error
injection.

Finally, amd_threshold_interrupt is AMD specific code,
intel_threshold_interrupt is also Intel specific code.

thx!
cyc


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ