linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86, mce, amd: extend mce-inject for support threshold interrupt event injection on AMD platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1415066556.24825.24.camel@debian>
Date:	Tue, 04 Nov 2014 10:02:36 +0800
From:	Chen Yucong <slaoub@...il.com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:	Aravind Gopalakrishnan <aravind.gopalakrishnan@....com>,
	tony.luck@...el.com, ak@...ux.intel.com, gong.chen@...ux.intel.com,
	linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86, mce, amd: extend mce-inject for support
 threshold interrupt event injection on AMD platform

On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 19:00 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 11:51:47AM -0600, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
> > On 11/3/2014 11:05 AM, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
> > >
> > >There are three ways that have been used to report machine check event.
> > >And they are MCE, CMCI/Threshold Interrupt, and POLL. On the Intel
> > >platform, CMCI/Threshold Interrupt and POLL share the same event handler
> > >- machine_check_poll(). However, on the AMD platform, they have a
> > >separate event handler. amd_threshold_interrupt() is used for handling
> > >Threshold Interrupt event. And machine_check_poll() has been used for
> > >polling other events.
> > >
> > >This patch introduces a new flag MCJ_INTERRUPT that will be used to
> > >separate CMCI/Threshold Interrupt and POLL handler in mce-inject.
> > >
> > >Signed-off-by: Chen Yucong <slaoub@...il.com <mailto:slaoub@...il.com>>
> > >---
> > > arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h              |    5 +++--
> > > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-inject.c |   16 ++++++++++++++++
> > > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/threshold.c  |    1 +
> > > 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > We currently test decoding logic on AMD by performing mce injections using
> > edac/mce_amd_inj.c,
> > So instead of modifying mce-inject just for testing
> > amd_threshold_interrupt(),
> > Why not put it under mce_amd_inj? (It's AMD specific code anyway)
> 
> Right, I think this is supposed to be vendor-agnostic as it is calling
> mce_threshold_vector() directly.
> 
I'm not sure I understand your point. But mce_threshold_vector is shared
by AMD and Intel. 

> Btw, I wouldn't mind if someone would sit down and unify those injection
> methods and come up with a saner interface which can actually be used by
> humans, not those yucky files you feed mce-inject with...
> 
Anyway, I think it can be work well for testing EDAC/raddaemon/mcelog
decoding logic. So I suggest you try to use it, and you can add it to
your list of test tools.

thx!
cyc

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/