[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141105170605.GL4570@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 18:06:05 +0100
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 10/12 v3] seq-buf: Make seq_buf_bprintf()
conditional on CONFIG_BINARY_PRINTF
On Tue 2014-11-04 10:52:47, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>
> The function bstr_printf() from lib/vsprnintf.c is only available if
> CONFIG_BINARY_PRINTF is defined. This is due to the only user currently
> being the tracing infrastructure, which needs to select this config
> when tracing is configured. Until there is another user of the binary
> printf formats, this will continue to be the case.
>
> Since seq_buf.c is now lives in lib/ and is compiled even without
> tracing, it must encompass its use of bstr_printf() which is used
> by seq_buf_printf(). This too is only used by the tracing infrastructure
> and is still encapsulated by the CONFIG_BINARY_PRINTF.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Please switch the order and do this change before moving to lib/.
IMHO, the current order would break bisecting when tracing is
disabled.
Otherwise, the change looks good in itself, so:
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz>
Best Regards,
Petr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists