lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:39:40 +0100
From:	Maxime Coquelin <>
To:	Lee Jones <>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <>
Cc:	Gabriel FERNANDEZ <>,
	Rob Herring <>,
	Pawel Moll <>,
	Mark Rutland <>,
	Ian Campbell <>,
	Kumar Gala <>,
	Srinivas Kandagatla <>,
	Patrice Chotard <>,
	Russell King <>,
	Grant Likely <>,
	<>, <>,
	<>, <>,
	Gabriel Fernandez <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/8] phy: miphy28lp: Add PHY header file for DT x Driver

On 11/07/2014 02:05 PM, Lee Jones wrote:

> If the merge turns out to be simple, then Git will do the correct
> thing; however, if the first version of the patch is applied, then
> some changes around the same area of the file occur _then_ when the
> second version (of the same patch differing only by SHA1) is applied
> Git will get confused.  If it has the same SHA1 however, Git will
> discard it as 'already applied'.  This is the reason we pass around
> shared tags to immutable branches.
Looking at how the patch is trivial, I persist to think there is no issue.
But OK, I will prepare an immutable branch..

Kishon, checkpatch complains because this new file has no maintainer.
Is it ok for you if I add it to the Generic PHY subsystem?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists