linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/8] phy: miphy28lp: Add PHY header file for DT x Driver defines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54619C9C.90605@ti.com>
Date:	Tue, 11 Nov 2014 10:50:28 +0530
From:	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
To:	Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@...com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC:	Gabriel FERNANDEZ <gabriel.fernandez@...com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...il.com>,
	Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <kernel@...inux.com>,
	Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/8] phy: miphy28lp: Add PHY header file for DT x Driver
 defines



On Monday 10 November 2014 04:09 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> 
> On 11/07/2014 02:05 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> 
> <snip>
>> If the merge turns out to be simple, then Git will do the correct
>> thing; however, if the first version of the patch is applied, then
>> some changes around the same area of the file occur _then_ when the
>> second version (of the same patch differing only by SHA1) is applied
>> Git will get confused.  If it has the same SHA1 however, Git will
>> discard it as 'already applied'.  This is the reason we pass around
>> shared tags to immutable branches.
> Looking at how the patch is trivial, I persist to think there is no issue.
> But OK, I will prepare an immutable branch..
> 
> Kishon, checkpatch complains because this new file has no maintainer.
> Is it ok for you if I add it to the Generic PHY subsystem?

yeah.. sure.

Thanks
Kishon
> 
> Regards,
> Maxime
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/