[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141110183453.GG25609@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 18:34:54 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"konrad.wilk@...cle.com" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
"Ian.Campbell@...rix.com" <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
"david.vrabel@...rix.com" <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 10/13] xen/arm/arm64: introduce xen_arch_need_swiotlb
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 04:14:02PM +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/xen/page.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/xen/page.h
> @@ -107,4 +107,8 @@ static inline bool set_phys_to_machine(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long mfn)
> #define xen_remap(cookie, size) ioremap_cache((cookie), (size))
> #define xen_unmap(cookie) iounmap((cookie))
>
> +bool xen_arch_need_swiotlb(struct device *dev,
> + unsigned long pfn,
> + unsigned long mfn);
> +
> #endif /* _ASM_ARM_XEN_PAGE_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/mm.c b/arch/arm/xen/mm.c
> index 0e96023..1b087cd 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/xen/mm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/xen/mm.c
> @@ -102,6 +102,13 @@ void __xen_dma_sync_single_for_device(struct device *hwdev,
> __xen_dma_page_cpu_to_dev(hwdev, handle, size, dir);
> }
>
> +bool xen_arch_need_swiotlb(struct device *dev,
> + unsigned long pfn,
> + unsigned long mfn)
> +{
> + return ((pfn != mfn) && !is_device_dma_coherent(dev));
> +}
Why not a static inline? It doesn't look like a big function.
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists