[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141110184111.GH25609@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 18:41:11 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"konrad.wilk@...cle.com" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
"Ian.Campbell@...rix.com" <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
"david.vrabel@...rix.com" <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 03/13] xen/arm: if(pfn_valid(pfn)) call native dma_ops
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 04:13:55PM +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> void xen_dma_unmap_page(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t handle,
> size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir,
> - struct dma_attrs *attrs);
> + struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +{
> + unsigned long pfn = PFN_DOWN(handle);
> + /* Dom0 is mapped 1:1, so calling pfn_valid on a foreign mfn will
> + * always return false. If the page is local we can safely call the
> + * native dma_ops function, otherwise we call the xen specific
> + * function. */
> + if (pfn_valid(pfn)) {
> + if (__generic_dma_ops(hwdev)->unmap_page)
> + __generic_dma_ops(hwdev)->unmap_page(hwdev, handle, size, dir, attrs);
Similarly here, do we need the unmap_page check? dma_map_page() does not
do it.
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists