[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFyh1ZOuLZw5Vb_ZTYhSsbwdqRFOceYSj7nh02NmKxy4AQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 13:47:01 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jerome Glisse <j.glisse@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>,
Larry Woodman <lwoodman@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
Brendan Conoboy <blc@...hat.com>,
Joe Donohue <jdonohue@...hat.com>,
Duncan Poole <dpoole@...dia.com>,
Sherry Cheung <SCheung@...dia.com>,
Subhash Gutti <sgutti@...dia.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Mark Hairgrove <mhairgrove@...dia.com>,
Lucien Dunning <ldunning@...dia.com>,
Cameron Buschardt <cabuschardt@...dia.com>,
Arvind Gopalakrishnan <arvindg@...dia.com>,
Shachar Raindel <raindel@...lanox.com>,
Liran Liss <liranl@...lanox.com>,
Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>,
Ben Sander <ben.sander@....com>,
Greg Stoner <Greg.Stoner@....com>,
John Bridgman <John.Bridgman@....com>,
Michael Mantor <Michael.Mantor@....com>,
Paul Blinzer <Paul.Blinzer@....com>,
Laurent Morichetti <Laurent.Morichetti@....com>,
Alexander Deucher <Alexander.Deucher@....com>,
Oded Gabbay <Oded.Gabbay@....com>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] lib: lockless generic and arch independent page table
(gpt) v2.
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> Or do you actually have a setup where actual non-CPU hardware actually
> walks the page tables you create and call "page tables"?
So just to clarify: I haven't looked at all your follow-up patches at
all, although I've seen the overviews in earlier versions. When trying
to read through the latest version, I got stuck on this one, and felt
it was crazy.
But maybe I'm misreading it and it actually has good reasons for it.
But just from the details I look at, some of it looks too incestuous
with the system (the split PTL lock use), other parts look really
really odd (like the 64-bit shift counts), and some of it looks just
plain buggy (the bitops for synchronization). And none of it is all
that easy to actually read.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists