[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141110214739.GB4366@pd.tnic>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 22:47:39 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Chen Yucong <slaoub@...il.com>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"aravind.gopalakrishnan@....com" <aravind.gopalakrishnan@....com>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] x86, mce: support memory error recovery for both
UCNA and Deferred error in machine_check_poll
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 09:44:26PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > In fact, you could redo this patch in the meantime without the AMD vendor
> > check so that Tony can pick them up soon. I'll add the correct AMD bits
> > later.
>
> You just want this hunk deleted ...
>
> + if (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD) {
> + /*
> + * AMD BKDGs - Machine Check Error Codes
> + *
> + * Bit 8 of ErrCode[15:0] of MCi_STATUS is used for indicating
> + * a memory-specific error. Note that this field encodes info-
> + * rmation about memory-hierarchy level involved in the error.
> + */
> + return (m->status & 0xff00) == BIT(8);
> + } else
>
> I can do that without a repost. Or I can leave a reminder ...
>
> + if (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD) {
> + /*
> + * coming soon
> + */
> + return false;
> + } else
Ok, that's fine too. I'll try to have a fix for this very soon so that
we can be just in time ready to go for 3.19.
With that you can slap
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
to them.
Thanks Tony.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists