[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141110221728.GA23419@pd.tnic>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 23:17:28 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <aravind.gopalakrishnan@....com>
Cc: Chen Yucong <slaoub@...il.com>, tony.luck@...el.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86, mce, severity: extend the the mce_severity
mechanism to handle UCNA/DEFERRED error
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 04:06:00PM -0600, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
> >+ MCESEV(
> >+ DEFERRED, "Deferred error",
> >+ NOSER, MASK(MCI_STATUS_UC|MCI_STATUS_DEFERRED|MCI_STATUS_POISON, MCI_STATUS_DEFERRED)
> > ),
>
> We don't need to have MCI_STATUS_POISON in the MASK() here as a deferred
> error is indicated by a {UC=0, Deferred = 1}
> (Older docs might be unclear on that..)
Well, I think that's ok because the MASK() macro actually makes the
check do:
look at bits MCI_STATUS_UC|MCI_STATUS_DEFERRED|MCI_STATUS_POISON and of
them three MCI_STATUS_DEFERRED has to be the only one set.
And that makes sense - we want deferred errors where we didn't attempt
to consume poisoned data (which is signalled by MCI_STATUS_POISON)....
Provided I'm reading this mce_severity thing correct, of course - more
often than not I don't because it is insanely ugly and hard to read.
> And it still says ADM on the commit message :)
Yeah, Advanced Devices Micro - that's the new name. :-P
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists