[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 10:20:23 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, LeeJon@...ck-us.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/48] kernel: Add support for power-off handler call
chain
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 09:33:48AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Introduce a system power-off handler call chain to solve the described
> > problems. This call chain is expected to be executed from the architecture
> > specific machine_power_off() function. Drivers providing system power-off
> > functionality are expected to register with this call chain. By using the
> > priority field in the notifier block, callers can control power-off
> > handler
>
> Linus rather disliked the idea of notifier chains for this... And I
> don't see how it got addressed.
>
Hi all,
After more thought, I concluded that it is technically impossible to support
multiple power-off handlers without some kind of list or call chain, no matter
how it is called. Given the opposition from Linus and the power maintainers
to the series, I decided to shelf it.
Thanks,
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists