[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141112141856.GA26488@ulmo>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:18:57 +0100
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
Cc: linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>,
mikko.perttunen@...si.fi, acourbot@...dia.com,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/13] of: document new emc-timings subnode in
nvidia,tegra124-car
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 08:56:27AM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
[...]
> Example SoC include file:
>
> / {
> - tegra_car: clock {
> + tegra_car: clock@...06000 {
> compatible = "nvidia,tegra124-car";
> reg = <0x60006000 0x1000>;
> #clock-cells = <1>;
> @@ -60,4 +83,23 @@ Example board file:
> &tegra_car {
> clocks = <&clk_32k> <&osc>;
> };
> +
> + clock@...06000 {
> + emc-timings@3 {
Shouldn't this be following the same naming scheme as the memory
controller's subnodes?
> + nvidia,ram-code = <3>;
> +
> + timing@...50000 {
And this?
Thierry
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists