lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 12 Nov 2014 10:11:31 +0800
From:	Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com>
To:	cmetcalf@...era.com
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch: tile: kernel: kgdb.c: Use memcpy() instead of pointer
 copy one by one

Hello maintainer:

Please help check this patch, when you have time (sorry for my original
typo for your email address, so maybe you did not notice about the
original mail).

Thanks.

On 11/1/14 21:17, Chen Gang wrote:
> Not only memcpy() is faster than pointer copy, but also let code more
> clearer and simple, which can avoid compiling warning (the original
> implementation copy registers by exceeding member array border).
> 
> The related warning (with allmodconfig under tile):
> 
>     CC      arch/tile/kernel/kgdb.o
>   arch/tile/kernel/kgdb.c: In function 'sleeping_thread_to_gdb_regs':
>   arch/tile/kernel/kgdb.c:140:31: warning: iteration 53u invokes undefined behavior [-Waggressive-loop-optimizations]
>      *(ptr++) = thread_regs->regs[reg];
>                                  ^
>   arch/tile/kernel/kgdb.c:139:2: note: containing loop
>     for (reg = 0; reg <= TREG_LAST_GPR; reg++)
>     ^
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com>
> ---
>  arch/tile/kernel/kgdb.c | 6 +-----
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/tile/kernel/kgdb.c b/arch/tile/kernel/kgdb.c
> index 4cd8838..ff5335a 100644
> --- a/arch/tile/kernel/kgdb.c
> +++ b/arch/tile/kernel/kgdb.c
> @@ -125,9 +125,7 @@ int dbg_set_reg(int regno, void *mem, struct pt_regs *regs)
>  void
>  sleeping_thread_to_gdb_regs(unsigned long *gdb_regs, struct task_struct *task)
>  {
> -	int reg;
>  	struct pt_regs *thread_regs;
> -	unsigned long *ptr = gdb_regs;
>  
>  	if (task == NULL)
>  		return;
> @@ -136,9 +134,7 @@ sleeping_thread_to_gdb_regs(unsigned long *gdb_regs, struct task_struct *task)
>  	memset(gdb_regs, 0, NUMREGBYTES);
>  
>  	thread_regs = task_pt_regs(task);
> -	for (reg = 0; reg <= TREG_LAST_GPR; reg++)
> -		*(ptr++) = thread_regs->regs[reg];
> -
> +	memcpy(gdb_regs, thread_regs, TREG_LAST_GPR * sizeof(unsigned long));
>  	gdb_regs[TILEGX_PC_REGNUM] = thread_regs->pc;
>  	gdb_regs[TILEGX_FAULTNUM_REGNUM] = thread_regs->faultnum;
>  }
> 

-- 
Chen Gang

Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ