[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141112132741.GA53560@unpythonic.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 07:27:42 -0600
From: Jeff Epler <jepler@...ythonic.net>
To: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com>
Cc: cmetcalf@...era.com,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch: tile: kernel: kgdb.c: Use memcpy() instead of
pointer copy one by one
It seems there's additional background required to understand the
diagnostic:
asm/ptrace.h has
struct pt_regs {
/* tp, sp, and lr must immediately follow regs[] for aliasing. */
pt_reg_t regs[53];
pt_reg_t tp; /* aliases regs[TREG_TP] */
pt_reg_t sp; /* aliases regs[TREG_SP] */
pt_reg_t lr; /* aliases regs[TREG_LR] */
and the intended copy overwites all of regs[], plus tp, sp, and lr.
It's intended for thread_regs.regs[TREG_TP] to alias to thread_regs.tp,
though in C this is undefined behavior (it dereferences a pointer past
the end of the structure).
> > arch/tile/kernel/kgdb.c:140:31: warning: iteration 53u invokes undefined behavior [-Waggressive-loop-optimizations]
> > *(ptr++) = thread_regs->regs[reg];
If compilers are beginning to exploit the rule that indexing past the
end of an array is UB, then the way that these register aliases are
created may need to be revisited with careful attention to what the C
standard actually says; I'm just going by memory. (I assume the
compiler could do things like replace an intended load from memory with
a constant load or even no load at all)
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists