[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5464A3F8.1000807@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 20:28:40 +0800
From: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>
To: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@...en8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
CC: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch V1 0/6] Refine generic/PCI MSI irqodmian interfaces
On 2014/11/13 19:43, Jiang Liu wrote:
> This patch set is based on tip/irq/irqdomain and tries to refine
> interfaces to support irqdomain for generic MSI and PCI MSI.
>
> Patch 1 is just minor fixes for tip/irq/irqdomain.
>
> Patch 2 introduces some helpers to hide struct msi_desc implementation
> details, so later we could move msi_list from struct pci_dev into
> struct device to enable generic MSI support.
Hi Gerry,
I tried to move msi info(eg. msi_list) into struct device, but I found
DMAR fault interrupt is initialized before the driver core init. And I don't
know whether there are other devices like ARM consolidator(introduced in GIC v3)
need to be initialized before driver core. What do you think about this ?
Thanks!
Yijing.
>
> Patch 3 introduces msi_domain_{alloc|free}_irqs() which generalize
> pci_msi_domain_alloc_irqs() to support generic MSI.
>
> Patch 4 introduces default data structures and callback implementations
> to support msi_domain_alloc_irqs(), so reduce burden on generic MSI
> users.
>
> Patch 5 converts PCI MSI to use generic MSI interfaces, and also
> implement default callbacks for PCI MSI.
>
> Patch 6 introduces a mechanism to replace arch_setup_msi_irq()/
> arch_setup_msi_irqs()/arch_teardown_msi_irq()/arch_teardown_msi_irqs().
>
> With this patch set applied, the generic MSI and PCI MSI interfaces
> are much easier to use. For extreme case, you only need to define
> a "struct msi_domain_info" and don't need to implement any callbacks,
> just using the default callbacks is OK:)
>
> This patch set is also a preparation for:
> 1) Kill all weak functions in drivers/pci/msi.c
> 2) Implement support for non-PCI-compliant MSI device
>
> It has been tested on x86 platforms, comments are welcomed!
>
> Jiang Liu (6):
> PCI, MSI: Fix errors caused by commit e5f1a59c4e12
> PCI, MSI: Introduce helpers to hide struct msi_desc implemenation
> details
> genirq: Introduce msi_domain_{alloc|free}_irqs()
> genirq: Provide default callbacks for msi_domain_ops
> PCI, MSI: Refine irqdomain interfaces to simplify its usage
> PCI, MSI: Provide mechanism to alloc/free MSI/MSIX interrupt from
> irqdomain
>
> drivers/pci/msi.c | 170 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> include/linux/msi.h | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> kernel/irq/msi.c | 150 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 366 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>
--
Thanks!
Yijing
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists