[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <54656E9A.8040702@samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 11:53:14 +0900
From: Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Cc: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@...sung.com>,
Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@...sung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/exynos/dsi: Add runtime PM so LCD power domain
could be turned off
On 2014년 11월 07일 22:53, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Add runtime Power Management to the Exynos DSI driver so the LCD power
> domain could be turned off.
>
> This slightly reduces the energy consumption when screen is completely
> turned off. On Trats2 board when the system was idle the energy
> consumption dropped by 1% (from 92.2 mA to 91.1 mA).
>
> Before the patch:
> $ cat cat /sys/kernel/debug/pm_genpd/pm_genpd_summary
> lcd0-power-domain on
> /devices/11c00000.fimd suspended
> /devices/11c80000.dsi unsupported
>
> After applying the patch:
> lcd0-power-domain off
> /devices/11c00000.fimd suspended
> /devices/11c80000.dsi suspended
Reasonable but this patch incurs page flip test timeout like below,
# modetest -v -s 15@12:720x1280
trying to open device 'i915'...failed.
trying to open device 'radeon'...failed.
trying to open device 'nouveau'...failed.
trying to open device 'vmwgfx'...failed.
trying to open device 'omapdrm'...failed.
trying to open device 'exynos'...success.
setting mode 720x1280-0Hz@...4 on connectors 15, crtc 12
select timed out or error (ret 0)
I'm not sure why this issue is incurred with this patch even through
this patch is reasonable and correct. So we need more checking.
P.S. I tested it on exynos-drm-next and m0 board.
Thanks,
Inki Dae
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
> index 24741d8758e8..19ed36d2d557 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> #include <linux/of_device.h>
> #include <linux/of_gpio.h>
> #include <linux/phy/phy.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/component.h>
>
> @@ -1356,6 +1357,8 @@ static int exynos_dsi_enable(struct exynos_dsi *dsi)
> if (dsi->state & DSIM_STATE_ENABLED)
> return 0;
>
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(dsi->dev);
> +
> ret = exynos_dsi_poweron(dsi);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
> @@ -1392,6 +1395,8 @@ static void exynos_dsi_disable(struct exynos_dsi *dsi)
> drm_panel_unprepare(dsi->panel);
> exynos_dsi_poweroff(dsi);
>
> + pm_runtime_put_sync(dsi->dev);
> +
> dsi->state &= ~DSIM_STATE_ENABLED;
> }
>
> @@ -1772,6 +1777,8 @@ static int exynos_dsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (ret)
> goto err_del_component;
>
> + pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
> +
> return ret;
>
> err_del_component:
> @@ -1781,6 +1788,8 @@ err_del_component:
>
> static int exynos_dsi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> + pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> +
> component_del(&pdev->dev, &exynos_dsi_component_ops);
> exynos_drm_component_del(&pdev->dev, EXYNOS_DEVICE_TYPE_CONNECTOR);
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists