[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZ_iEy8_LbbjYm7Rp5=WeuhAwRH3Rv8GFBKOpC=ikVcZw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 10:40:55 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: baytrail: show output gpio state correctly on
Intel Baytrail
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 10:51 PM, David Cohen
<david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 09:34:24PM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
>> to a list of devices we depend on, we can defer this particular driver
>> going further in probe until all the dependencies listed in _DEP are
>> resolved.
>
> That's the best way to prevent this issue IMHO, but looks like it's
> already being addressed:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/27/455
-EPROVE_DEFER will solve (hackishly) the probing problem.
It will not solve remove() or power up/down sequencing.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists