linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 05/11] drm: bridge/dw_hdmi:split some phy configuration to platform driver

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Date:	Fri, 14 Nov 2014 19:08:43 +0800
From:	Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>
To:	Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel <Zubair.Kakakhel@...tec.com>,
	airlied@...ux.ie, heiko@...ech.de, fabio.estevam@...escale.com,
	rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk
CC:	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, ykk@...k-chips.com,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>, jay.xu@...k-chips.com,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>, mark.yao@...k-chips.com,
	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, djkurtz@...gle.com,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
	Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 05/11] drm: bridge/dw_hdmi:split some phy configuration
 to platform driver


On 2014年11月14日 18:55, Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel wrote:
>
> On 14/11/14 10:53, Andy Yan wrote:
>> Hi ZubairLK:
>>     Thanks for your review.
>> On 2014年11月14日 18:19, Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel wrote:
>>> Hi Andy,
>>>
>>> Nice work on this patch series. Its getting better and better :).
>>>
>>> On 14/11/14 03:27, Andy Yan wrote:
>>>> hdmi phy clock symbol and transmission termination value
>>>> can adjust platform specific to get the best SI
>>>                          ^Is this signal integrity?
>>     yes , SI  is signal integrity, such as eye diagram measurement
>>> Are these two disjoint features in separate patches?
>>>
>>>> also add mode_valid interface for some platform may not support
>>>> all the display mode
>>> Sounds like another separate patch to me. :)
>>     they can seperate
>>> Also, This series is becoming quite large. With major changes and fixes mixed together.
>>>
>>> Patch 3 splits imx-drm.
>>> Patch 4 moves dw-drm out of imx-drm folder.
>>> Patch 7 adds binding
>>> Patch 9 converts to drm bridge.
>>>
>>> Can these be placed together easily?
>>> And in the start. i.e. patch 1, 2, 3, 4,
>>>
>>> Then all fixes etc can come afterwards?
>>>
>>> It helps when checking histories later as to how a driver was made and how fixes happened.
>>>
>>> Especially when file moves happen..
>>    Do you mean we can rearrange the patch series?
>>    put patch 3, 4 ,7, 9 together  one bye one
>>    than followed by the fixes patches  5 ,6, 8, 11 ?
> Yes. Rearrange so that the split imx-drm/imx-hdmi and conversion to drm-bridge is at the start of the series.
> Then the rest are bug fixes and feature additions.
   Can I put patch#1(make checkpatch happy) and patch#2 (defer probe) as 
the first two patch.
   Daniel from Google chromium think it's better to put the two slightly 
changes in the front for easy review.
> Cheers,
> ZubairLK
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-rockchip mailing list
> Linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives