[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5465E3DF.6050307@imgtec.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 11:13:35 +0000
From: Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel <Zubair.Kakakhel@...tec.com>
To: Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>, <airlied@...ux.ie>,
<heiko@...ech.de>, <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>,
<rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>
CC: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <ykk@...k-chips.com>,
<devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
<linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>, <jay.xu@...k-chips.com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>, <mark.yao@...k-chips.com>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <djkurtz@...gle.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 05/11] drm: bridge/dw_hdmi:split some phy configuration
to platform driver
On 14/11/14 11:08, Andy Yan wrote:
>
> On 2014年11月14日 18:55, Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel wrote:
>>
>> On 14/11/14 10:53, Andy Yan wrote:
>>> Hi ZubairLK:
>>> Thanks for your review.
>>> On 2014年11月14日 18:19, Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel wrote:
>>>> Hi Andy,
>>>>
>>>> Nice work on this patch series. Its getting better and better :).
>>>>
>>>> On 14/11/14 03:27, Andy Yan wrote:
>>>>> hdmi phy clock symbol and transmission termination value
>>>>> can adjust platform specific to get the best SI
>>>> ^Is this signal integrity?
>>> yes , SI is signal integrity, such as eye diagram measurement
>>>> Are these two disjoint features in separate patches?
>>>>
>>>>> also add mode_valid interface for some platform may not support
>>>>> all the display mode
>>>> Sounds like another separate patch to me. :)
>>> they can seperate
>>>> Also, This series is becoming quite large. With major changes and fixes mixed together.
>>>>
>>>> Patch 3 splits imx-drm.
>>>> Patch 4 moves dw-drm out of imx-drm folder.
>>>> Patch 7 adds binding
>>>> Patch 9 converts to drm bridge.
>>>>
>>>> Can these be placed together easily?
>>>> And in the start. i.e. patch 1, 2, 3, 4,
>>>>
>>>> Then all fixes etc can come afterwards?
>>>>
>>>> It helps when checking histories later as to how a driver was made and how fixes happened.
>>>>
>>>> Especially when file moves happen..
>>> Do you mean we can rearrange the patch series?
>>> put patch 3, 4 ,7, 9 together one bye one
>>> than followed by the fixes patches 5 ,6, 8, 11 ?
>> Yes. Rearrange so that the split imx-drm/imx-hdmi and conversion to drm-bridge is at the start of the series.
>> Then the rest are bug fixes and feature additions.
> Can I put patch#1(make checkpatch happy) and patch#2 (defer probe) as the first two patch.
> Daniel from Google chromium think it's better to put the two slightly changes in the front for easy review.
Sure.
I am not the maintainer. They have to make the final decision.
ZubairLK
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists