[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141114075209.5a358890@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 07:52:09 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 06/23 v4] tracing: Have function_graph use
trace_seq_has_overflowed()
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 13:41:26 +0100
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz> wrote:
> > -static enum print_line_t
> > +static void
> > print_graph_irq(struct trace_iterator *iter, unsigned long addr,
> > enum trace_type type, int cpu, pid_t pid, u32 flags)
> > {
> > - int ret;
> > struct trace_seq *s = &iter->seq;
> >
> > if (addr < (unsigned long)__irqentry_text_start ||
> > addr >= (unsigned long)__irqentry_text_end)
> > - return TRACE_TYPE_UNHANDLED;
> > + return;
>
> I was curious if the TRACE_TYPE_UNHANDLED return value has any special
> effect. But it seems to be ignored. There are only two callers and
> they take care only of the PARTIAL_LINE return value.
Yep, I noticed that too, and did the same check before I made the
change. IIRC, that UNHANDLED was written in case anyone did care.
>
> [...]
>
> > @@ -953,62 +856,43 @@ print_graph_entry_nested(struct trace_iterator *iter,
> > return TRACE_TYPE_NO_CONSUME;
> > }
> >
> > -static enum print_line_t
> > +static void
> > print_graph_prologue(struct trace_iterator *iter, struct trace_seq *s,
> > int type, unsigned long addr, u32 flags)
> > {
> > struct fgraph_data *data = iter->private;
> > struct trace_entry *ent = iter->ent;
> > int cpu = iter->cpu;
> > - int ret;
> >
> > /* Pid */
> > - if (verif_pid(s, ent->pid, cpu, data) == TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE)
> > - return TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE;
> > + verif_pid(s, ent->pid, cpu, data);
> >
> > - if (type) {
> > + if (type)
> > /* Interrupt */
> > - ret = print_graph_irq(iter, addr, type, cpu, ent->pid, flags);
> > - if (ret == TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE)
> > - return TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE;
> > - }
> > + print_graph_irq(iter, addr, type, cpu, ent->pid, flags);
> >
> > if (!(trace_flags & TRACE_ITER_CONTEXT_INFO))
> > - return 0;
> > + return;
> >
> > /* Absolute time */
> > - if (flags & TRACE_GRAPH_PRINT_ABS_TIME) {
> > - ret = print_graph_abs_time(iter->ts, s);
> > - if (!ret)
> > - return TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE;
> > - }
> > + if (flags & TRACE_GRAPH_PRINT_ABS_TIME)
> > + print_graph_abs_time(iter->ts, s);
> >
> > /* Cpu */
> > - if (flags & TRACE_GRAPH_PRINT_CPU) {
> > - ret = print_graph_cpu(s, cpu);
> > - if (ret == TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE)
> > - return TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE;
> > - }
> > + if (flags & TRACE_GRAPH_PRINT_CPU)
> > + print_graph_cpu(s, cpu);
> >
> > /* Proc */
> > if (flags & TRACE_GRAPH_PRINT_PROC) {
> > - ret = print_graph_proc(s, ent->pid);
> > - if (ret == TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE)
> > - return TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE;
> > -
> > - ret = trace_seq_puts(s, " | ");
> > - if (!ret)
> > - return TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE;
> > + print_graph_proc(s, ent->pid);
> > + trace_seq_puts(s, " | ");
> > }
> >
> > /* Latency format */
> > - if (trace_flags & TRACE_ITER_LATENCY_FMT) {
> > - ret = print_graph_lat_fmt(s, ent);
> > - if (ret == TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE)
> > - return TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE;
> > - }
> > + if (trace_flags & TRACE_ITER_LATENCY_FMT)
> > + print_graph_lat_fmt(s, ent);
> >
> > - return 0;
> > + return;
>
> This probably even fixed a bug. The function returned
> TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE (0) even when it did not print anything.
>
> The simplification is really cool.
Thanks,
-- Steve
>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz>
>
> Best Regards,
> Petr Mladek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists