lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD6G_RREb58La-pC48BHW+9r9oruUXnCrk-RS8LaKSw6y9jgxg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 14 Nov 2014 18:25:12 +0530
From:	Jagan Teki <jagannadh.teki@...il.com>
To:	tj@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Cc:	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: read performance is too low compared to write - /dev/sda1

Hi,

I'm doing a performance testing on my bench ARM box.

1. dd test: I have validate the read and write by mounting /dev/sda1
with ext4 filesystem,
    able to get the good performance numbers where read is high
compared to write

2.  robocopy test:
     - mkfs.ext4 /dev/sda1
     - mount /dev/sda1 /media/disk
     - << configured samba >>
     - Mapped the /media/disk on windows
     - login on the mapped driver in windows
     - did a robocopy test, where write got 84MBps and read 14MBps

read performance is too slow when compared to write in robocopy case.
Can anyone help me out, how to debug this further.

thanks!
-- 
Jagan.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ