linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] adp1653: Add device tree bindings for LED controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201411170943.20810@pali>
Date:	Mon, 17 Nov 2014 09:43:19 +0100
From:	Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:	sre@...ian.org, sre@...g0.de,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, tony@...mide.com, khilman@...nel.org,
	aaro.koskinen@....fi, freemangordon@....bg, bcousson@...libre.com,
	robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
	ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
	sakari.ailus@....fi, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] adp1653: Add device tree bindings for LED controller

On Sunday 16 November 2014 08:59:28 Pavel Machek wrote:
> For device tree people: Yes, I know I'll have to create file
> in documentation, but does the binding below look acceptable?
> 
> I'll clean up driver code a bit more, remove the printks.
> Anything else obviously wrong?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
> 
> Thanks,
> 								Pavel
> 
> 

Hello,

I think that this patch is probably not good and specially not 
for n900. adp1653 should be registered throw omap3 isp camera 
subsystem which does not have DT support yet.

See n900 legacy board camera code in file board-rx51-camera.c.

-- 
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@...il.com

Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)