linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] adp1653: Add device tree bindings for LED controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141116101548.GB32483@amd>
Date:	Sun, 16 Nov 2014 11:15:48 +0100
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
Cc:	pali.rohar@...il.com, sre@...ian.org, sre@...g0.de,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, tony@...mide.com, khilman@...nel.org,
	aaro.koskinen@....fi, freemangordon@....bg, bcousson@...libre.com,
	robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
	ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
	sakari.ailus@....fi, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] adp1653: Add device tree bindings for LED controller

On Sun 2014-11-16 11:09:51, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
> 
> Am 16.11.2014 um 08:59 schrieb Pavel Machek:
> > For device tree people: Yes, I know I'll have to create file in
> > documentation, but does the binding below look acceptable?
> [...]
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n900.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n900.dts
> > index 739fcf2..ed0bfc1 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n900.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n900.dts
> > @@ -553,6 +561,18 @@
> >  
> >  		ti,usb-charger-detection = <&isp1704>;
> >  	};
> > +
> > +	adp1653: adp1653@30 {
> 
> This should probably be led-controller@30 (a generic description not
> specific to the model). The label name is fine.

Thanks.

> > +		gpios = <&gpio3 24 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; /* Want 88 */
> 
> At least to me, the meaning of "Want 88" is not clear - drop or clarify?

I changed it to /* 88 */ to match rest of code.

Best regards,
								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/