linux-kernel - Re: s390/net: Deletion of unnecessary checks before two function calls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <546A06A1.3060203@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:	Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:30:57 +0100
From:	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
	Frank Blaschka <blaschka@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	Ursula Braun <ursula.braun@...ibm.com>, linux390@...ibm.com,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: s390/net: Deletion of unnecessary checks before two function
 calls

> What do you want me to clarify?  Do you still not see the bug?

Would you like to point out that you notice the warning message
"fsm: kfree_fsm called with NULL argument" after my update suggestion?

How do you think about to share a bit more information about the
corresponding function call graph from your test system?

Regards,
Markus

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/